By Ryan Grillo
The muscular foreign policy of President Trump is not about glory for glory’s sake. It is a clear expression of America First.
Trump’s understanding of our national interests is simple and clear: Critical assets and strategic geography are core; both must be secured for the defense and prosperity of American citizens.]
It doesn’t stop there, and Trump understands this. It is something that has been true since 1776 — a strong America is good for the world. When the United States was weak or retreated from its responsibilities on the global stage, bad actors stepped into the abyss, disrupting peace.
Putting America first ensures that we remain the global superpower.
There is no time for adherence to conventions that no longer serve America’s interests. Our competitors for security and prosperity are aggressively seeking these objectives at our expense.
The post-Cold War consensus — like many 20th-century globalist institutions — has outlived its use-by date. With bipartisan support, it has held America back by putting global interests first, not America’s.
In the early 1990s, this was vital to asserting American values globally. However, the world has changed. Not changing with it has compromised America’s security and the security of its people.
American voters understand this. Their re-election of Trump is an endorsement of a foreign policy that puts American — not global — interests first. This is what Trump promised, and it is the clear prism through which every facet of his foreign policy can be understood.
It can and should be taken at face value. When the National Security Strategy states that the United States will work for a Western Hemisphere free of hostile foreign incursion, no one should be surprised when that strategy is executed.
Similarly, when the strategy calls for energy dominance, strategic natural resources will be paramount; they are vital for powering every country’s economy.
Russia and China have been aggressively asserting their energy security. China is actively pursuing a policy of domination of the global market for rare earths and critical minerals. The United States has no choice but to act.
Trump is neither deluded nor patient about this, nor should any American president be. He will fight fire with fire, defend our strategic energy assets and aggressively compete for safe access to them. This guided our strategy in Venezuela and will guide our approach to initiatives from Greenland to Africa to Southeast Asia.
Some say Trump shouldn't have seized Maduro.
Others think that he shouldn't have left the VP in power.
Here's why both are wrong and Trump was right to both remove Maduro and avoid chaos.
Leaders matter a lot. Rodríguez may be the Deng of Venezuela. https://t.co/xeXTpmjpeY
— Richard Hanania (@RichardHanania) January 7, 2026
Our traditional allies remain asleep and have not woken up to this reality. Europe’s pursuit of green energy policies has cost it dearly; the EU devotes more time to energy regulation than energy security, and without it, its economies have stagnated.
A timid approach to foreign policy means it cannot pursue energy security abroad. The president has made it clear that the United States will not follow this path to energy insecurity and geopolitical weakness.
Greenland is symptomatic of Brussels’ failure to understand this reality. The giant North American island sits at the center of control of the Arctic, yet Europe has failed to grasp its value.
Russian and Chinese military power aims to extend farther down the North American Arctic through Greenland; they have no intention of stopping. They want to push into our trade and military lanes and eventually access Greenland’s mineral assets, or worse, block our access to the Arctic.
Yes, Trump has upset Europe regarding Greenland, only because he is telling the truth and not pulling punches.
Putting America first is a simple choice that meets the reality of our world. The outdated globalist model is over. Trump is taking America in the opposite direction, and the world will be far better off as a result.
What Trump is addressing is the risk that if Greenland becomes independent (which many of our left-wing politicians want), then Greenland's politicians may make a deal with Russia or China.
They have previously been in talks with China about building airports there. Their… https://t.co/HgAOLwMw9r pic.twitter.com/KrTPP2juXA
— Jonatan Pallesen (@jonatanpallesen) January 12, 2026
Originally published at NH Journal
Disclaimer: www.BrusselsReport.eu will under no circumstance be held legally responsible or liable for the content of any article appearing on the website, as only the author of an article is legally responsible for that, also in accordance with the terms of use.
